Last Updated on February 15, 2026 by Ewen Finser
ShareASale was a cornerstone of affiliate marketing for years. For many brands, it was the default starting point — the place where initial partnerships formed and early affiliate revenue took shape.
For a long time, it worked well enough.
But tracking became more complex. Privacy rules changed how data could be collected. Marketing teams started asking harder questions about attribution, fraud, and real performance. ShareASale, meanwhile, stayed largely the same, and that gap kept widening.
As a result, toward the end of its lifespan, ShareASale users felt friction in several areas:
- Reporting & dashboards: Data wasn’t intuitive or real-time. Teams often had to export spreadsheets and manually piece insights together.
- Manual operations: Payout approvals, partner management, and routine workflows required more hands-on effort as programs scaled.
- Limited automation: Rule-based approvals, fraud detection, and partner segmentation lagged behind newer platforms.
- Attribution constraints: As brands focused more on multi-touch paths and incrementality, ShareASale’s tracking options felt restrictive.
- Affiliate experience: Dashboards were clunky, approvals could be slow, and confidence in tracking wasn’t always strong.
And then the shutdown news became public, and brands and affiliates suddenly had to make fast decisions about their affiliate infrastructure.
I’ve helped brands move off legacy platforms like ShareASale and tested most of the major affiliate tools on the market. So today, I’m going to walk you through the strongest ShareASale alternatives available right now. I’ll break down what each platform actually does well, where the limitations are, and which one might be right for you.
What to Look For in a ShareASale Alternative

When evaluating a replacement, it’s easy to get distracted by feature lists and polished demos. What matters more is how a platform performs under real conditions:
- Reliable, modern tracking: Basic cookie tracking isn’t enough anymore. First-party tracking, server-side postbacks, and cross-device attribution are table stakes. If tracking isn’t dependable, trust breaks and everything else becomes noise.
- A great partner experience: Affiliates work across multiple programs. If onboarding is clunky, dashboards are confusing, or reporting is hard to access, engagement drops. Clean interfaces and self-serve tools directly affect how actively partners promote.
- Automation that scales with growth: Manual approvals and payouts don’t scale. Automated workflows, fraud protection, and payout management reduce operational drag and protect your team as the program grows.
- Migration support that minimizes disruption: Clean data imports, structured onboarding, and clear training reduce partner friction and revenue risk during the transition.
Best ShareASale Alternatives: At a Glance
Platform | Best For | Integrations | Pricing Model | Ideal Business Size |
Modern, multi-channel affiliate programs | Shopify, Stripe, HubSpot, Salesforce, API | Custom pricing | Mid-size to Enterprise | |
Enterprise partnership programs | Salesforce, Shopify, NetSuite, CRM tools | Contract-based | Enterprise | |
Retail brands and influencer-heavy programs | Shopify, Magento, Google Analytics, APIs | Contract-based | Mid to Large | |
Traditional publisher network replacement | E-commerce platforms, advertiser tools | Network fees | Mid-size to Enterprise | |
Technical teams and custom workflows | API-first, CRM tools, payment processors | Custom pricing | Mid-size to Enterprise | |
Shopify and smaller e-commerce brands | Shopify, WooCommerce, PayPal, Stripe | Subscription tiers | Small to Mid-size |
1. Everflow

Everflow feels less like a “network” and more like infrastructure. If ShareASale was a marketplace you plugged into, Everflow is more like building your own engine — you control the tracking, the rules, and how partnerships actually run.
You just connect your e-commerce platform and other systems, set up tracking (mostly server-side and first-party), and define your attribution logic. From there, you can automate approvals, commissions, and payouts instead of reviewing everything manually. It also lets you manage different partner types (affiliates, influencers, media buyers) in one place.
Pros
- Reliable Tracking: Strong first-party and server-side setup reduces data gaps
- Automation: Cuts down the manual approval and payout workload
- Modern Reporting: Easier to navigate than older networks
- Flexible Structure: You’re not locked into a marketplace model
Cons
- No Built-In Discovery: You need to source affiliates yourself
- Setup Takes Thought: Not a plug-and-play tool
- Not Cheap: Overkill for very small programs
Best For: Brands that are serious about affiliate as a growth channel and want infrastructure they won’t need to replace next year.
2. Impact

Impact is typically what companies move to when partnerships get complicated. It’s not just for affiliates — it handles influencers, referrals, B2B deals, and other partner types in one system.
It allows you to onboard partners, define contracts and commission terms, and manage everything through structured workflows. It’s designed to give large teams control and visibility, supporting flexible attribution models and connecting deeply with e-commerce and CRM systems.
Pros
- Handles Multiple Partner Types: Not just affiliates
- Strong Contract Controls: Good for compliance-heavy teams
- Flexible Attribution: Works for complex commission structures
Cons
- Learning Curve: Takes time to understand fully
- Heavier UI: Not the simplest experience
- Deep complexity: Can feel oversized for lean programs
Best For: Mid-to-enterprise brands running structured, multi-channel partnership programs.
3. Partnerize

Partnerize sits somewhere between a performance tool and a relationship platform. Through it, you can manage recruitment, tracking, and payouts in one place. It’s built for brands that want automation and data insights but still care about managing partner relationships closely — especially at scale.
It leans into predictive insights to help optimize performance, and it’s built to support international programs, which matters if you’re operating in multiple regions.
Pros
- Strong Global Support: Handles international programs well
- Automation Tools: Reduces repetitive admin work
- Clear Reporting: Good visibility into partner performance
- Partner Management Focus: Built for structured programs
Cons
- Premium Tier: Not a budget solution
- Requires Strategy: Works best when you know what you’re building
- Less Ideal for Micro-Programs: May be overbuilt for small teams
Best For: Retail and e-commerce brands managing larger or international affiliate programs.
4. CJ Affiliate

CJ Affiliate is one of the legacy players in affiliate marketing. If you want something closest to the traditional “network” experience, this is it: a large publisher base, an established ecosystem, and familiar workflows.
You just join the network, list your program, and recruit from CJ’s pool of publishers. Tracking and payments are handled inside their system. It’s structured and standardized — which can be reassuring if you’re used to network-based programs.
Pros
- Large Publisher Marketplace: Easier partner discovery
- Established Infrastructure: Proven track record
- Centralized Payments: Handles payouts for you
- Familiar Model: Smooth transition for legacy users
Cons
- Dated Interface: Less modern UX compared to newer SaaS platforms
- Limited Customization: Less flexible attribution logic
- Network Dependency: Dependent on CJ’s larger ecosystem
Best For: Brands that want built-in publisher access and a traditional affiliate network structure.
5. Affise

Affise is more technical. It’s designed for teams that want to customize their tracking logic and workflows.
You don’t use Affise for simplicity — you use it for control. It provides real-time tracking, fraud prevention tools, and customizable automation rules, and the API-first structure makes it easier to integrate into existing internal systems (if you have developers involved).
Pros
- Highly Customizable: Flexible tracking and commission rules
- API-Driven: Good for integration-heavy setups
- Fraud Controls: Built-in protection tools
- Deep Reporting: Strong segmentation capabilities
Cons
- Technical Setup: Best implemented with developer involvement
- Less Intuitive UI: Focused more on function than simplicity
- No Native Affiliate Marketplace: Requires external partner sourcing
Best For: Performance-focused teams with technical resources who want maximum flexibility.
6. Refersion

Refersion is straightforward and e-commerce-focused. It’s especially common with Shopify brands that want to launch or manage an affiliate program without a heavy setup process.
You connect your e-commerce store, create commission rules, onboard affiliates, and track conversions through their dashboard. Payouts can be automated, and most teams can get live quickly.
Pros
- Quick Setup: Fast integration with e-commerce platforms
- User-Friendly Interface: Minimal training required
- Automated Payouts: Reduces manual finance work
- Shopify Focused: Strong native e-commerce integration
Cons
- Basic Attribution: Limited advanced multi-touch tracking
- Less Scalable: May be outgrown by larger programs
- Simpler Reporting: Fewer deep customization options
Best For: Small to mid-size e-commerce brands that want something simple, stable, and easy to manage.
Which ShareASale Alternative Is Right for You?
Here’s how I usually help teams narrow it down.

Scaling Brands
Everflow or Impact: If you’re growing fast and need better tracking, automation, and visibility, these platforms tend to support that momentum. They’re built for teams that don’t want to manage everything themselves anymore.
Traditional Affiliate Networks
CJ Affiliate: If your program relies heavily on classic content publishers, loyalty sites, and network discovery, CJ still fits that mold well. It feels familiar to many long-time affiliates.
Small E-Commerce Teams
Refersion: For lean teams running Shopify or similar platforms, Refersion keeps things straightforward: Less complexity, faster setup, and enough functionality to run a clean program without overhead.
Technical or Product-Led Teams
Affise: If you have developers involved and want deep control through APIs and custom workflows, Affise makes sense. It rewards technical ownership more than plug-and-play simplicity.
Influencer-Heavy Programs
Partnerize: When partnerships blur the line between affiliates, creators, and brand collaborations, Partnerize shines. It handles non-traditional partnerships with more structure and flexibility.
ShareASale’s Exit Is an Opportunity, Not a Setback
ShareASale wasn’t perfect, but it worked, and a lot of real programs were built on it — and losing something familiar always creates friction first.
Once that settles, though, this moment forces an honest look at how most affiliate programs were actually running. A lot of setups were held together by habits: tracking that was “good enough,” reporting that required extra effort, and workflows that depended on manual checks instead of systems.
Moving off ShareASale gives brands a chance to clean that up. Better tracking, clearer attribution, and less hands-on work change how confident teams feel in their numbers. It also shows partners that the program is being taken seriously, especially when onboarding is smoother and payouts are easier to trust.
If you treat this transition as a reset instead of a disruption, you don’t just replace ShareASale; you end up with a program that’s easier to run, easier to scale, and better aligned with how partnerships actually work today.
